On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:57:03 -0800
Tom Eastep wrote:
> I've done some more checking and now understand what is happening.
>
> The shorewall.spec file uses the %ghost directive for files that have
> been superceded. That way, if the file exists, it will not be removed
> in the next upgrade. There
Hi !!! I send the date but still waiting aprove. The correct word to the
problem is not block, is drop connections.
Thx.
De: Tom Eastep
Enviado: miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2014 12:26
Para: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Shorewall-use
Beta 4 is now available for testing. It corrects a number of defects
found in testing of Beta 3.
Additionally, the basic TC filter new feature has been changed. I
decided to make basic filter use contingent on an option setting, given
that Shorewall can't reliably detect the extent of basic filter
On 2/14/2014 5:34 AM, Rodrigo Cortes wrote:
> Hi !!! I send the date but still waiting aprove. The correct word to the
> problem is not block, is drop connections.
>
Rodrigo,
I got your email -- what IP address were you connecting from and what IP
address were you trying to connect to?
Thanks
