[Shorewall-users] host

2014-05-26 Thread Paolo
Hi list I usually install shorewall to stand-alone servers or into servers that act non only, but also as gateway for other boxes. If I install a dedicated box as firewall, usually I consider dedicated distro like IpCop, PFSense, ZeroShell, ... because they give me a distro already har

Re: [Shorewall-users] host

2014-05-26 Thread Filippo Carletti
> sometimes I ask to myself and now to the list: If you are planning to > install a box wich primary activity is firewalling (usual > NET/LAN/DMZ/WLAN config), wich distro do you consider/prefer? Disclaimer: I'm one of the developers of NethServer. I use NethServer, which is a distro based on Cen

Re: [Shorewall-users] host

2014-05-26 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 01:54:24PM +0200, Paolo wrote: > > Hi list > > I usually install shorewall to stand-alone servers or into servers > that act non only, but also as gateway for other boxes. > If I install a dedicated box as firewall, usually I consider dedicated > distro like IpCop,

Re: [Shorewall-users] host

2014-05-26 Thread matt darfeuille
I also use debian stable along with shorewall and depending of the requirements some additionel packets and on embedded devices I run openwrt stable along with shorewall-lite! So in an nutshell I will not install a distribution on which shorewall/shorewall-lite can not be used!!!:) -Matt On

[Shorewall-users] Shorewall 4.5.21.10

2014-05-26 Thread Tom Eastep
For those who are reluctant to upgrade to the new major release, I've corrected a couple of problems in 4.5.21. 1) The tarball installers, now install .service files with mode 644 rather than mode 600. 2) Previously, 1:1 NAT was disabled in Shorewall6, even if IPv6 NAT is supported. 3)