On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:33:30AM +0300, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
>
> However, I use both shorewall and shorewall6 on CentOS (+ the EPEL
> official repository) and the version of shorewall distributed there
> (shorewall-4.6.5.3-1.el7.noarch) still don't include any version of
> the macro.
>
> The sho
On 09/19/2015 09:01 AM, Ob Noxious wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm playing a bit with GlusterFS - https://www.gluster.org/ - and of
> course, I want it to work flawlessly with Shorewall.
>
> GlusterFS needs some TCP ports for the control channel (the easy part:
> 24007/tcp) but it also need some dynamically
On 09/19/2015 01:33 AM, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
> Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> I'll replace your previously-submitted macro with this one.
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your quick reaction and for shorewall itself, that is a
> *great* tool!
>
> The main differences between the two macros are: 1. the
Hi,
I'm playing a bit with GlusterFS - https://www.gluster.org/ - and of
course, I want it to work flawlessly with Shorewall.
GlusterFS needs some TCP ports for the control channel (the easy part:
24007/tcp) but it also need some dynamically opened ports.
In a nutshell : If you create a distribu
Tom Eastep wrote:
I'll replace your previously-submitted macro with this one.
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your quick reaction and for shorewall itself, that is a
*great* tool!
The main differences between the two macros are: 1. the "?FORMAT 2" line
and 2. I've added the TCP protocol on port
