These are the packages installed on my firewall:
shorewall-core-4.5.7.1-3.fc18.noarch
shorewall-4.5.7.1-3.fc18.noarch
IIRC I just pulled them down from the fedora yum repo.
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 11:18 +0100, PH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Fedora 18 32-bit.
>
> On the shorewall site it says to use
>
You would use masq on bond0.
--
Phil Foxton RHCE
-- Original Message ---
From: "Boby Philip"
To:
Sent: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:31:13 +0530
Subject: [Shorewall-users] NIC Bonding
> Hai,
>
> IF I aggregate two NIC by using Linux bonding, which interface I
\ eth2\ISP2
\eth3/
BOND1
Thus making use of both features, allowing for high throughput and failover.
Hope that makes sense
Phil
--
Phil Foxton RHCE
-- Original Message ---
From: Paolo Basenghi
To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11
could combine the
two (given enough NICs and enough ISP connections)
--
Phil Foxton RHCE
-- Original Message ---
From: "Boby Philip"
To:
Sent: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:47:44 +0530
Subject: [Shorewall-users] Linux Bonding
> What is the difference between Shorewall mult
Thanks for that Tom, just to clarify though, does LIMIT just drop the
connections momentarily or is it in effect adding the source to the dynamic
list?
Thanks
Phil
--
Phil Foxton RHCE
-- Original Message ---
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Shorewall Users
Sen
int $12}'| grep -v
192\.168\.31 | grep -v 212.56.68.42| grep -v 212.219.9.79| sed s/\#53//g`; do
# /sbin/shorewall drop $j >/dev/null;
#done
for l in `cat /var/log/httpd/access_log | grep .dll| awk '{print $1}'`; do
