On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 11:33:30AM +0300, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
>
> However, I use both shorewall and shorewall6 on CentOS (+ the EPEL
> official repository) and the version of shorewall distributed there
> (shorewall-4.6.5.3-1.el7.noarch) still don't include any version of
> the macro.
>
> The
Tom Eastep wrote:
I'll replace your previously-submitted macro with this one.
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your quick reaction and for shorewall itself, that is a
*great* tool!
The main differences between the two macros are: 1. the "?FORMAT 2" line
and 2. I've added the TCP protocol on port
On 09/19/2015 01:33 AM, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
> Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> I'll replace your previously-submitted macro with this one.
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your quick reaction and for shorewall itself, that is a
> *great* tool!
>
> The main differences between the two macros are: 1.
Hello,
Please include tinc macro (macro.Tinc file) in stock shorewall package
(under /usr/share/shorewall for IPv4 and the corresponding place for IPv6).
Tinc (http://www.tinc-vpn.org/) is a popular VPN solution, similar to
OpenVPN, but mesh-capable. It uses standard port 655 on both TCP and
On 9/17/2015 4:32 AM, Răzvan Sandu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please include tinc macro (macro.Tinc file) in stock shorewall package
> (under /usr/share/shorewall for IPv4 and the corresponding place for IPv6).
>
> Tinc (http://www.tinc-vpn.org/) is a popular VPN solution, similar to
> OpenVPN, but