Re: [Shorewall-users] Adoption rate (Was: IPSEC NAT-T IKE fails when policy is $FW2net REJECT.)

2007-03-24 Thread ktneely
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:07:39AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:04:42AM +, Simon Hobson wrote: As for Debian, they have the popularity contest which I believe is supposed to gather stats on what people are running. Yes. It looks at the atime stamps for

Re: [Shorewall-users] Adoption rate (Was: IPSEC NAT-T IKE fails when policy is $FW2net REJECT.)

2007-03-23 Thread Simon Hobson
Bruce S. Skinner wrote: I've read your ruminations in the shorewall-devel list about the adoption rate of Shorewall. I wouldn't be so sure that shorewall isn't getting lots of use. It's part of lot's of distros and it just works. I use it on about a dozen machines (and I wouldn't care to say

Re: [Shorewall-users] Adoption rate (Was: IPSEC NAT-T IKE fails when policy is $FW2net REJECT.)

2007-03-23 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:04:42AM +, Simon Hobson wrote: It's installed on every Linux box I set up now irrespective of its role. Now I've done a few in different configs, it's almost trivial to set up to control access to a server or whatever - and an important factor, I know it

Re: [Shorewall-users] Adoption rate (Was: IPSEC NAT-T IKE fails when policy is $FW2net REJECT.)

2007-03-23 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:07:39AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: Yes. It looks at the atime stamps for stuff that's been run in the past 30 days; frequency doesn't matter. Also it reports on stuff that's installed, regardless of usage. Current results: of approximately 3 installations