On 3/27/2014 8:20 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
> > Nevermind. The problem is that use invoked the Invalid action
> from
> > within the INVALID section. If you replace 'Invalid(DROP)' with
> 'DROP'
> > in that section, it works correctly.
> Make that ...that *you*
> Nevermind. The problem is that use invoked the Invalid action
from
> within the INVALID section. If you replace 'Invalid(DROP)' with 'DROP'
> in that section, it works correctly.
Make that ...that *you* invoked the...".
OK thank you for your time.
On 3/26/2014 9:10 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 3/26/2014 8:57 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>> On 3/26/2014 2:18 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
>>> If you want me to look at this, you will need to send me an
>>> archive of /etc/shorewall with a capabilities file. Some simply
>>> local testin
On 3/26/2014 8:57 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 3/26/2014 2:18 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
>> If you want me to look at this, you will need to send me an
>> archive of /etc/shorewall with a capabilities file. Some simply
>> local testing has not shown any problem.
>>
>> Pl
Sorry, wasn't sure which format you expected.
Le mercredi 26 mars 2014 à 08:57 -0700, Tom Eastep a écrit :
> On 3/26/2014 2:18 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
> > If you want me to look at this, you will need to send me an
> > archive of /etc/shorewall with a capabilities file. Some simply
On 3/26/2014 2:18 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
> If you want me to look at this, you will need to send me an
> archive of /etc/shorewall with a capabilities file. Some simply
> local testing has not shown any problem.
>
> Please find enclosed the requested files.
>
> Th
If you want me to look at this, you will need to send me an
archive of /etc/shorewall with a capabilities file. Some simply
local testing has not shown any problem.
Please find enclosed the requested files.
Thanks for taking time to look at it.
No -- it i
On 3/25/2014 10:46 AM, Hervé Werner wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I discovered something wrong in comments generated by the rules file :
> I had an issue with a software triggering INVALID packets (gnome-shell
> weather extension), didn't manage to figure out why, so I just
> configured Shorewall to DROP th
Hello.
I discovered something wrong in comments generated by the rules file :
I had an issue with a software triggering INVALID packets (gnome-shell
weather extension), didn't manage to figure out why, so I just
configured Shorewall to DROP them all by adding lines in the INVALID
section of the ru
