Andras Sarkozy wrote:
> Tom Eastep wrote:
>
>> You are welcome.
>>
>> Any additional testing of ipsets that you can do would be very much
>> appreciated.
>>
>> -Tom
>
> Right now I'm using ipsets only for blacklisting purposes. I had to go with
> ipsets due to the sheer size of the blacklist.
>
Tom Eastep wrote:
> You are welcome.
>
> Any additional testing of ipsets that you can do would be very much
> appreciated.
>
> -Tom
Right now I'm using ipsets only for blacklisting purposes. I had to go with
ipsets due to the sheer size of the blacklist.
I have one set for dropping SMTP requ
Andras Sarkozy wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I was lurking for a long time here and finally decided to jump into the perl
> testing (mostly due to the slow shell compilation).
> I upgraded my 3.4.1 to 3.9.4 and run shorewall check on my current settings.
>
> The given file set compiles with the shell co
Hi Tom,
I was lurking for a long time here and finally decided to jump into the perl
testing (mostly due to the slow shell compilation).
I upgraded my 3.4.1 to 3.9.4 and run shorewall check on my current settings.
I got a few errors:
Checking /etc/shorewall/blacklist...
ERROR: ipset names in
