I have struggled for days to make this work but admit I am soundly defeated.
My goal is to dnat two cameras through an Odroid N2+. But I can't even get a
basic ACCEPT to work on ports 80 or 443. I can't understand what is wrong. Dump
is attached. Sure hope the boss is still around.
[Tue Jan 30
On 8/5/2020 5:03 PM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
> I have struggled for days to make this work but admit I am soundly defeated.
>
> My goal is to dnat two cameras through an Odroid N2+. But I can't even get a
> basic ACCEPT to work on ports 80 or 443. I can't understand what is wro
On 8/5/20 8:03 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
> I have struggled for days to make this work but admit I am soundly defeated.
>
> My goal is to dnat two cameras through an Odroid N2+. But I can't even
> get a basic ACCEPT to work on ports 80 or 443. I can't understand what
> is wr
Hi Matt,
local (cameras) zone is 10.2.20.1 and net zone is 10.2.1.106.
If I do shorewall clear, dnat can't work.
I didn't try to access http/https during that snip.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 9:01 AM, Matt Darfeuille
wrote:
> On 8/5/2020 5:03 PM, colony.
Thank you Tom, but actually there is a DNS ACCEPT rule.
I didn't make this clear enough but I am trying to dnat from net to local, for
example incoming port 51554 to local 10.2.20.51:554 . Here are my rules:
# Cameras
ACCEPT net:10.2.1.4$FW tcp 50554 -
DNAT
On 8/5/20 9:30 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
> Thank you Tom, but actually there is a DNS ACCEPT rule.
>
> I didn't make this clear enough but I am trying to dnat from net to local,
> for example incoming port 51554 to local 10.2.20.51:554 . Here are my rules:
>
> # Cameras
> A
HAZZAH, like magic the Master does it again!
This is regular Shorewall, compiling rules in its own machine, all in
/etc/shorewall.
BUT, AUTOMAKE=Yes. As soon as I set it to No, everything started TWERKING!
Thank you again Tom. I never would have found this in a million years.
For others, bew
On 8/5/20 10:30 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
> HAZZAH, like magic the Master does it again!
>
> This is regular Shorewall, compiling rules in its own machine, all in
> /etc/shorewall.
>
> BUT, AUTOMAKE=Yes. As soon as I set it to No, everything started TWERKING!
>
> Thank you
On 8/5/20 9:30 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
> Thank you Tom, but actually there is a DNS ACCEPT rule.
>
> I didn't make this clear enough but I am trying to dnat from net to local,
> for example incoming port 51554 to local 10.2.20.51:554 . Here are my rules:
>
> # Cameras
> A
I see. Chrony is getting blocked.
All this setup is temporary because soon it will be going through a WireGuard
tunnel.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 10:51 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 8/5/20 10:30 AM, colony.three--- via Shorewall-users wrote:
>
> > HAZZAH, l
10 matches
Mail list logo