Re: [Shorewall-users] routeback option explicitly disabled generates error

2015-08-12 Thread jone...@teksavvy.com
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:54:30 -0700 Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net wrote: The attached patch applies with an offset. Thanks, works fine ! Is there a need to patch shorewall6 also ? --

Re: [Shorewall-users] routeback option explicitly disabled generates error

2015-08-11 Thread Tom Eastep
On 08/10/2015 04:37 PM, jone...@teksavvy.com wrote: On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:22:23 -0700 Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net wrote: On 08/07/2015 12:27 PM, jonetsu wrote: Would this be a bug ? It looks like the parsing for the presence of the routeback option does not take into account the

Re: [Shorewall-users] routeback option explicitly disabled generates error

2015-08-10 Thread jone...@teksavvy.com
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:22:23 -0700 Tom Eastep teas...@shorewall.net wrote: On 08/07/2015 12:27 PM, jonetsu wrote: Would this be a bug ? It looks like the parsing for the presence of the routeback option does not take into account the value. Looks like a bug. Would there be any chance

Re: [Shorewall-users] routeback option explicitly disabled generates error

2015-08-08 Thread Tom Eastep
On 08/07/2015 12:27 PM, jonetsu wrote: Hello, Having an undefined zone along with disabling explicitly the routeback option generates an error as if the '0' value of the routeback option (which i assume is disabling the option) is not taken into account: Shorewall 4.6.4.3.

[Shorewall-users] routeback option explicitly disabled generates error

2015-08-07 Thread jonetsu
Hello, Having an undefined zone along with disabling explicitly the routeback option generates an error as if the '0' value of the routeback option (which i assume is disabling the option) is not taken into account: Shorewall 4.6.4.3. interfaces   -    eth2        -