[Shr-Devel] ffalarms: bump to version 0.4

2010-03-25 Thread Łukasz Pankowski
Hi ffalarms 0.4 pushed into git, I attach patch for the recipe (some dependencies removed, including alsa scenarios, and now needs postinst/postrm) By the way: --- I was building it locally using SRCREV_pn-ffalarms = "${AUTOREV}" and SRC_URI of my local git repository and was building

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Benjamin Schieder
On 25.03.2010 13:17:48, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Benjamin Schieder wrote: > > On 24.03.2010 20:40:45, Jakob wrote: > > > A proper implementation would stop the daemons to be > > updated BEFORE the update, run the update, and then restart the daemons > > again. > > > No

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Joshua Judson Rosen
Tom Hacohen writes: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:21 PM, "Sybren A. Stüvel" wrote: > > > > Some daemons check for usage first, i.e. KDM > > doesn't restart when a user is still logged in. I've seen plenty of > > other daemons restart though, such as Bind and PostgreSQL. > > In our case, all the

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:36 PM, "Sybren A. Stüvel" wrote: > On 25-3-2010 12:25, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > In our case, all the daemons are pretty much used all the time. (Even if > > the only maintain state of some resource like gsm). > > I see your point. Do you think that a signal "please re-read

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Sybren A. Stüvel
On 25-3-2010 12:25, Tom Hacohen wrote: > In our case, all the daemons are pretty much used all the time. (Even if > the only maintain state of some resource like gsm). I see your point. Do you think that a signal "please re-read your configuration" would be a good solution? > Don't you think? I

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:21 PM, "Sybren A. Stüvel" wrote: > Some daemons check for usage first, i.e. KDM > doesn't restart when a user is still logged in. I've seen plenty of > other daemons restart though, such as Bind and PostgreSQL. > > In our case, all the daemons are pretty much used all the

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Sybren A. Stüvel
On 25-3-2010 7:58, Benjamin Schieder wrote: > Actually, they do. A proper implementation would stop the daemons to be > updated BEFORE the update, run the update, and then restart the daemons > again. Yup, I can confirm that. Some daemons check for usage first, i.e. KDM doesn't restart when a user

Re: [Shr-Devel] Restarting daemons upon installation

2010-03-25 Thread Tom Hacohen
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Benjamin Schieder < blindco...@scavenger.homeip.net> wrote: > On 24.03.2010 20:40:45, Jakob wrote: > > Think about it, when you upgrade daemons on your desktop, do they restart > on > > their own? > > Actually, they do. No here (arch linux) they don't. At least if