"Dr. Michael Lauer" writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Arguably those two paragraphs are already well satisfied by oFono.
>> oFono probably now has the advantage in terms of maturity and
>> deployment, is compilable by a standard C compiler, and has a recent
>> version packaged in Debian.
>
> FSO is compilable w
Hi,
> Arguably those two paragraphs are already well satisfied by oFono.
> oFono probably now has the advantage in terms of maturity and
> deployment, is compilable by a standard C compiler, and has a recent
> version packaged in Debian.
FSO is compilable with a standard C compiler as well. Every
Enrico Zini writes:
> What I think is needed now are components that give existing
> distributions capabilities they didn't have before. Then to see what
> people develop on top of them.
+1
> But to be appealing to developers who are new to the system (which
> basically means, all of them), suc
