The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from an
author of
A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates
draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-17.txt
which has an intended status of Standard Track.
All versions, past and present, are available at
http://too
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from an
author of
A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository Structure
draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct-03.txt
which has an intended status of BCP.
All versions, past and present, are available at
http:
For the record, I object. the filed IPR claim at the IETF site is
vague and does not provide sufficient details to isolate the claim at
the US patent office.
I visited the US patent office and searched in the "PAIR" system and
it replied:
Sorry, the entered Application Number "12/
Indeed I did! Thanks for the correction.
Geoff
On 28/10/2009, at 1:52 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from
the authors of draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt.
The document (and the draft history)
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
authors of draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-arch-09
I'm pretty sure Geoff means:
http://to
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
authors of draft-ietf-sidr-arch-09.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-arch-09
The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd
November - this
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
authors of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06
The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd
November
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
authors of draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt
The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd
November - this is a
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Randy Bush wrote:
the particular wg co-chair is a co-author on both drafts.
Wrong. go re-read the authors section of 03. The same edit which added
you as an author removed Geoff.
whoops! well, at least i did contribute to it.
Shame on you Randy, for hijacking WG proc
>> the particular wg co-chair is a co-author on both drafts.
> Wrong. go re-read the authors section of 03. The same edit which added
> you as an author removed Geoff.
whoops! well, at least i did contribute to it.
> Shame on you Randy, for hijacking WG process for a personal agenda.
even if
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, George Michaelson wrote:
On 28/10/2009, at 11:23 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and one
not by a wg co-chair.
randy
The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which
>> naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the
>> children. children might be RIRs (parent IANA), or end sites (parent
>> ISPs or owning non-end user sites (e.g. business subsidiaries or govt
>> structures)).
>>
>> again, i suggest something like 'parent' and 'child', though
I support this.
-Original Message-
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Pradosh Mohapatra (pmohapat)
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:45 PM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt as SIDR WG
document
The authors would l
On 28/10/2009, at 11:53 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and
one
not by a wg co-chair.
The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which has not
been
discussed or addressed by the authors (which includes yourself Randy)
this is j
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Randy Bush wrote:
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and one
not by a wg co-chair.
The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which has not been
discussed or addressed by the authors (which includes yourself Randy)
this is just part o
>> i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and one
>> not by a wg co-chair.
> The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which has not been
> discussed or addressed by the authors (which includes yourself Randy)
this is just part of normal life in the ietf. you migh
On 28/10/2009, at 11:23 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and one
not by a wg co-chair.
randy
The conflicting draft has an outstanding IPR claim, which has not been
discussed or addressed by the auth
I am opening a two week wg call for comments on the adoption of this
document as a working group item.
This is a new version of the draft that was presented at the last IETF
meeting (http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/75/slides/sidr-8.pdf). Potential
adoption of the pfx-validate draft as a workin
On 28/10/2009, at 11:30 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
Sandy, with your WG chair hat on, could you please issue a WG Last
Call on the following document:
draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-05.txt
still reading, but ...
naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the
children. ch
> Sandy, with your WG chair hat on, could you please issue a WG Last
> Call on the following document:
> draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-05.txt
still reading, but ...
naming of actors in this document still assumes that ISPs are the
children. children might be RIRs (parent IANA), or end
> The authors would like to request that
> draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG
> document.
i support this
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
i object to last call on this. there is a conflicting draft, and one
not by a wg co-chair.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
The authors would like to request that
draft-pmohapat-sidr-pfx-validate-03.txt be adopted as a SIDR WG
document.
Thanks,
- Pradosh
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Matt, If you don't mind I'd like to add some input to this discussion
too.
On 28/10/2009, at 6:28 AM, Matt Lepinski wrote:
Geoff,
I'm happy to accept that the new wording is poor, but I'm pretty
sure the old wording was also bad, and I think this discussion is
important.
The old wordi
Sandy, with your WG chair hat on, could you please issue a WG Last
Call on the following document:
draft-ietf-sidr-rescerts-provisioning-05.txt
I am a co-author of this document.
Thanks,
Byron
_
Byron Ellacott
I wish to request you as as working group chair to conduct a Working
Group Last call on the following documents of which I am a co-author:
draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-17
draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct-03.txt
draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-03.txt
-George
WG Co-chair hat OFF
Matt,
I'm happy to accept that the new wording is poor, but I'm pretty
sure the old wording was also bad, and I think this discussion is
important.
Please do not misunderstand me - I was not implicitly expressing a
preference for the old wording when I questioned
Geoff,
I'm happy to accept that the new wording is poor, but I'm pretty sure
the old wording was also bad, and I think this discussion is important.
The old wording could easily be interpreted to suggest that once per day
was the correct frequency for pulling from a repository. (That is, I
b
28 matches
Mail list logo
