On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi
wrote:
> Chris,
>
> There is also this WG document which is missing in your list:
> "Use cases and interpretation of RPKI objects for issuers and relying parties"
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-01
easy enough to add. than
> I agree that intent can not be known.
>
> Which is why I had asked that the motivation / intent related text be
> included in the introduction, not in the requirements.
i have done so in the yet-to-be-released version
3.19 A BGPsec design SHOULD NOT presume to know the intent of the
Chris,
There is also this WG document which is missing in your list:
"Use cases and interpretation of RPKI objects for issuers and relying parties"
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-01
Sriram
From: sidr-boun...@ietf.org [sidr-boun...@ietf
