Hi,
On Jul 17, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Rob Austein wrote:
This draft defines the mappings from filename extension (.cer, .roa,
.crl, etc) to ASN.1 object type (X.509 certificate, ROA, CRL, etc).
Without this mapping, relying party tools have no way of knowing what
they're looking at in most
On 18/07/11 9:39 PM, Tim Bruijnzeels t...@ripe.net wrote:
Hi,
I agree that not having this mapping is tedious and error prone for RPs.
I can agree that a mapping system is useful. It may just be that living unix
world for far too long has seen me move away from the mandatory dos-like
And I'm happy to see it written as a hint. A validated mapping should
come, in my opinion from something more robust which also transcends
the technology used in the repository.
easy. throw away the entire structure and code to date and do it as a
collection of tlvs.
i suspect no one else
On 19/07/11 2:23 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
And I'm happy to see it written as a hint. A validated mapping should
come, in my opinion from something more robust which also transcends
the technology used in the repository.
easy. throw away the entire structure and code to date and
