On 02/06/2013 01:52 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> I beg your pardon - I missed the "S" in the WG column.
>
> Moving it over there
awesome, thanks! :) it does look like something IDR should poke at though.
> Stewart
>
> On 06/02/2013 18:50, Chris Morrow wrote:
>> IDR not S-IDR ? (or I missed the
I beg your pardon - I missed the "S" in the WG column.
Moving it over there
Stewart
On 06/02/2013 18:50, Chris Morrow wrote:
IDR not S-IDR ? (or I missed the tie-in to S-IDR...)
On 02/06/2013 01:47 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
The following errata was filed, but this is beyond the scope
of an e
IDR not S-IDR ? (or I missed the tie-in to S-IDR...)
On 02/06/2013 01:47 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> The following errata was filed, but this is beyond the scope
> of an errata system to address.
>
> I think that the right process is for the WG to decide the answer
> and if necessary for someone
The following errata was filed, but this is beyond the scope
of an errata system to address.
I think that the right process is for the WG to decide the answer
and if necessary for someone to write up a short update to
RFC5291
I will close the errata with a pointer to this thread in the
SIDR arch
Stumbled across this... posted 1/15:
"A few weeks ago, Mozilla started to use RPKI+ROA, here is a quick
introduction. "
"It’s so easy that nobody with a RIR account has a valid excuse to not
start using it!"
https://blog.mozilla.org/it/2013/01/15/rpki-roa/
--Heather
__
Stumbled across this... posted 1/15:
"A few weeks ago, Mozilla started to use RPKI+ROA, here is a quick
introduction. "
"It’s so easy that nobody with a RIR account has a valid excuse to not
start using it!"
https://blog.mozilla.org/it/2013/01/15/rpki-roa/
--Heather
_
