Sounds like a plan to me.
spt
On 3/1/13 11:36 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Great... so assuming the authors deal with this set of comments we'll
ask them to spin a new version and submit that for WGLC when it
arrives?
Does that seem like a good path for those still listening?
-chris
co-chair
I thought I asked you this but I don't seem to see anything in my sent folder.
Do you want to speak (or want me to speak) about the as-migration draft on the
sidr agenda?
--Sandy
From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 4:03 PM
To: sidr@ietf
Overall this looks good. I found one minor issue and a bunch of nits,
and I have some questions:
= minor =
4.6.7. Notification of Certificate Issuance by the CA to Other Entities:
There is no section 4.4.3.
= questions =
1.5.1. Organization administering the document: Should the address
and/o
I'll go along with that.
I'm not seeing any major structural alterations to the draft (at this stage) by
doing that.
Cheers,
Terry
On 02/03/2013, at 2:37 AM, "Christopher Morrow" wrote:
> Great... so assuming the authors deal with this set of comments we'll
> ask them to spin a new version
I guess I should have also said that I support moving this draft down
the path towards publication.
spt
On 3/4/13 6:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
I'll go along with that.
I'm not seeing any major structural alterations to the draft (at this stage) by
doing that.
Cheers,
Terry
On 02/03/2013
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> I guess I should have also said that I support moving this draft down the
> path towards publication.
>
I got that :) I am/was/am waiting for the next rev to pop into the tracker.
> spt
>
>
> On 3/4/13 6:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
>>
>> I'l
