> The document is intended as "Informational" but do have requirement
> language.
normative language in an info doc is perfectly normal and acceptable.
this doc does not create protcol, protocol data elements, ... it says
HOW to do some tricks with already defined protocol and pdus. so info
see
From: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) [mailto:rogag...@cisco.com]
The document is intended as "Informational" but do have requirement language.
Is this what you intended?
[WEG] originally, it was just covering the problem statement. This last
revision added the solution, and thus required some normat
Hi George,
Thanks for writing this document, I think it is very good work!
One comment before sending my support email. The document is intended as
"Informational" but do have requirement language. Is this what you intended?
Personally, I would rather all requirements to be moved to the requir
> All - I have not received any feedback regarding this draft since I
> posted the revision incorporating the solution into it in
> February. Perhaps it's time to call WG adoption so that it can move
> forward?
i thought i had previously supported adoption. but, just in case, i do
so now.
randy
