Could we not use the work done in RFC2725? I suspect that the delta is
remarkably small, and a quick scan right now conforms that impression for me
(that the delta is not great).
Geoff
On 28/08/2013, at 1:52 PM, Stephen Kent wrote:
> I am sympathetic to the concerns that Randy has cited. I
Speaking as a regular ol' member
>I am sympathetic to the concerns that Randy has cited. In particular, I
>am uncomfortable
>with the ability of a signer to enumerate an unconstrained list of
>object types that
>are signed. We need to consider the semantic of each object that can be
>covered by
Sandy,
I support draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying, but it is clearly not ready. It
contains quite
a few notes from Sean, embedded in the text, that need to be resolved.
It also needs to be updated to cite EST as an RFC. I'll send comments to
Sean directly.
I am not supportive of draft-ietf-sidr-bg
