Hi Sandra,
Thanks for all your comments. To be honest, we did not updated the document for
quite some time waiting for the advancement of the BGPSEC
thread/requirements/protocol documents. I agree that we should now update it to
be consistent with the changes in the main documents but I believ
I better understand your comment. Your concern appears to be that a reader of
this doc will assume that we decided to not consider the security of other path
attributes because they are less important than AS_Path. However, by stating
that securing these other attributes is deemed out of scope,
Dear Working Group:
The co-authors of the multi-publication points document would like to propose a
new course of action to the WG referring to this document.
Since its initial submission, the document addresses two problems related to
the support of multiple operators in RPKI:
i)- Mu
The final agenda for IETF88 has been posted.
Here's the link.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/88/agenda.html
--Sandy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr