Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-austein-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-00

The wg call for adoption has ended. The response from the wg indicates consensus for adoption of this as a working group work item. The authors should submit the draft with a wg formatted name (draft-ietf-sidr-yada-yada). --Sandy, speaking as a wg co-chair

Re: [sidr] a query to the wg regarding publication draft

There have been few replies to this message (thanks to Steve and Tim for their replies), perhaps because there's no deadline set to urge action. Please do respond to the list by 13 Dec with your thoughts on Rob's question. --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair ___

Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases

Yes, support adoption. I'm willing to review and provide feedback. Sriram > >Howdy gentle WG folks, >The authors of: > > >are interested in starting a WG Adoption call for this piece of scribed text. >It >would be good if other folk also

[sidr] a new direction for draft-ietf-sidr-multiple-publication-points

The authors made a suggestion (see below) for a new course of action for the draft draft-ietf-sidr-multiple-publication-points, splitting the draft into two work items. And there have been nearly two months of mostly silence on the point. (Thanks to Steve and Arturo for their replies.). If