Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases

There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. Can others please look at this and speak up as to whether you do or do not support adoption? Recall: silence does not indicate interest. We give this another two weeks (for pe

[sidr] about draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-04

The draft draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-04 has grown over time, mostly from the author's energy, not wg discussion. But this is an important and subtle issue. The latest version was submitted 17 Dec. There's a section called "Key rollover" which says only "TBD". Could the wg please look at this

Re: [sidr] WG Adoption: draft-ymbk-lta-use-cases

> There were four responses to this adoption call, all positive. But > four is not a strong indication of wg wishes here. note that the wg meeting in berlin asked for a requirements draft randy pgp_l4NC6UrXQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ sidr mai

[sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs

Working Group Folken, Today starts a WGLC for the subject draft: Abstract: This document describes requirements for a BGP security protocol design to provide cryptographic assurance that the origin AS had the right to announ