Re: [sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04

2014-04-25 Thread Randy Bush
from a running router policy-statement rpki { term valid { from { protocol bgp; validation-database valid; } then { validation-state valid; community add whatever-the-heck-i-want;

[sidr] WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04

2014-04-25 Thread Sandra Murphy
The authors of BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community, draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-04 have requested a WGLC. This message begins a two week WGLC, to end on 9 May 2014. The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signali

Re: [sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

2014-04-25 Thread Randy Bush
i really hate to side with dr kent :) i am unsure of this is a useful work item. please explain how it is other than a complex (i.e. dangerous) patch to accommodate sloppy operational praactices by a CA. make the protocol complex and you are vulnerable forever. sloppy CA ops practices can alw

[sidr] WG adoption poll for draft-huston-rpki-validation-01

2014-04-25 Thread Sandra Murphy
The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01. Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this as a work item. You do not need to comment