Randy,
because the goal of this draft can already be reached simply through use
of existing means, i do not support publication. i am not strongly
opposed. it's just one more bit of ietf work that is not obviously
needed.
Here are the three reasons that may refresh our mind on why after 4
Randy,
while checking the docco, i found
3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the
BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then
be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such
mechanisms SHOULD conform with
We run a RPKI monitor that examines various statistics of the emerging
RPKI and its relationship to global BGP trace data. Aspects of the
RPKI-BGP
component are similar to some of the other monitors, the RPKI analysis
component
offers some new data and visualizations of emerging RPKI structure
3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the
BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then
be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such
mechanisms SHOULD conform with [I-D.ietf-sidr-ltamgmt].
...
3.17 If a
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the
BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then
be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such
mechanisms
This document creates an IANA registry for the BGP origin validation
state.
which is highly inappropriate, as the three and only three states are
cast in stone. this should be removed if we're going to progress the
document.
2) Documenting change on BGP decision process changes: Section 3.
3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the
BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then
be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such
mechanisms SHOULD conform with [I-D.ietf-sidr-ltamgmt].
...
3.17 If a
On May 5, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
3.14 While the trust level of a route should be determined by the
BGPsec protocol, local routing preference and policy MUST then
be applied to best path and other routing decisions. Such
mechanisms SHOULD
Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:03:46PM +0200, Randy Bush:
And lets not forget: Running Code: Last but not least???the draft has
been delayed more than what it should and several implementations
(including two from Cisco) has running code + documentation +
training. As we are pushing to improve
