On 20 May 2014, at 4:38 am, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels t...@ripe.net wrote:
Certificate 1: {10.0.0.0/12, AS64501, AS64505, AS64509} (TA certificate)
Certificate 2: {10.0.0.0/22, AS64501, AS64505, AS64511}
Certificate
On May 13, 2014, at 12:23, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Though I’m not sure that there is a huge distinction between disabling
BGPSec and taking the router offline since disabling BGPSec would trigger
neighbor session resets for capability renegotiation unless we’ve
specified otherwise in
Though I’m not sure that there is a huge distinction between disabling
BGPSec and taking the router offline since disabling BGPSec would trigger
neighbor session resets for capability renegotiation unless we’ve
specified otherwise in the protocol docs (doesn’t look like it in my quick
skim),
funny. datatracker does not show wglc for this document
randy, trying to time that small fix for roque
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of
the IETF.
Title : Router Keying for BGPsec
Authors : Sean Turner
Keyur Patel
SIDR Chairs,
This version address all known outstanding comments. At this point, I’d like
to request a WGLC but realize that this draft probably needs to progress with
the other BGPsec drafts.
spt
On May 20, 2014, at 10:05, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is
i didn't update the tracker... (i hadn't ever in the past).
Did we circle down on an answer for the leak/persay language that
everyone's happy with? If so I'd like to push out a pub request today.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
funny. datatracker does not show
i didn't update the tracker... (i hadn't ever in the past).
uh, that is between you and the datawhacker
Did we circle down on an answer for the leak/persay language that
everyone's happy with? If so I'd like to push out a pub request today.
as far as i am aware, there is no issue with leak
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
i didn't update the tracker... (i hadn't ever in the past).
uh, that is between you and the datawhacker
Did we circle down on an answer for the leak/persay language that
everyone's happy with? If so I'd like to push out a pub
Speaking as regular ol' member.
On Apr 21, 2014, at 11:55 PM, Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote:
==
Except that the signed object signature algorithm OID will be
rsaEncryption which I think is still PKCS#1v1.5, but is not in section
5 of rfc4055.
I am unsure what you
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Geoff Huston gih...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2014, at 4:38 am, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's unclear to me what would happen if you split this into a
prefix/asn per cert and just carried more certs in your purse. Why
would I not
11 matches
Mail list logo
