On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
> Sandy,
>
>> Perhaps you are reading too much into the use of "conforming to"? Perhaps
>> saying "aligning with" would make it more clear to you? I do not know what
>> current CMS implementations would do if they were presented with a RFC6485
Randy,
really do appreciate review.
you're welcome.
do not appreciate pdfs of word docs; makes copy paste and commenting
back a major pain. though i have come to suspect that is one of your
goals. so i will not comment on your comments in that pdf, though i
adopted/adapted the majority, wit
Hi,
Stephen Kent wrote on 01/06/15 18:31:
> Di Ma and I, with help from several folks at BBN, have generated this
> document to try to characterize the set of attacks/errors that might
> adversely impact INR holders in the RPKI context. As we discuss topics
> like RPKI path validation, the Suspend
