Hi Terry,
On 5/17/16 11:37 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to c
Hi,
> On 18 May 2016, at 15:08, Brian Haberman wrote:
>
> Hi Terry,
>
> On 5/17/16 11:37 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to a
Hi Tim,
On 5/18/16 10:32 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On 18 May 2016, at 15:08, Brian Haberman
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Terry,
>>
>> On 5/17/16 11:37 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
>>> Terry Manderson has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>>>
>
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Hiya Stephen,
On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free
Hiya,
On 18/05/16 17:06, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hiya Stephen,
>
> On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> e
Hiya Stephen,
On 5/18/16 12:09 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 18/05/16 17:06, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> Hiya Stephen,
>>
>> On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: Discuss
>>>
>>> W
goto bottom:-)
On 18/05/16 17:20, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hiya Stephen,
>
> On 5/18/16 12:09 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 18/05/16 17:06, Brian Haberman wrote:
>>> Hiya Stephen,
>>>
>>> On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Stephen Farrell has entered the following
comments inline. speaking as a regular ol’ wg member
On May 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hiya Stephen,
>
> On 5/18/16 12:09 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 18/05/16 17:06, Brian Haberman wrote:
>>> Hiya Stephen,
>>>
>>> On 5/18/16 11:51 AM, Stephen Farrell
Hi Sandy,
On 18/05/16 22:12, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> comments inline. speaking as a regular ol’ wg member
>
> On May 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Brian Haberman
> wrote:
>
>> Hiya Stephen,
>>
>> On 5/18/16 12:09 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hiya,
>>>
>>> On 18/05/16 17:06, Brian Haberman wr
I would rather the sigs were signed by ee certs which were in the
blob, than have to make an external reference and I would rather we
varied the compliance needs to remove a pointless external ref.
If there has to be a ref, I think making it mandated to a specific
scheme is over specifying, especi
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to htt
Hi Brian,
On 18/05/2016, 11:08 PM, "Brian Haberman" wrote:
>
>You are correct that the use of the RPKI repository is one of
>convenience. My original implementation of this approach used non-RPKI
>certificates. I would be fine with putting a statement in the
>Introduction along the lines of:
>
>"
13 matches
Mail list logo
