Re: [sidr] rpki-tree-validation vs. madi-sidr-rp

Hi, all, Speaking as the co-author of ‘Requirements for Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Relying Parties’, In addition to the clarification made by Steve, I would like to deliver a clear message here that this draft is intended to make the RP requirements well framed, which are

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-07

Rob: Hi! Did you have comments on this? I'm assuming that we're expecting an updated document at some point, but if we need to discuss more... Thanks! Alvaro. On 5/25/16, 12:09 AM, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" wrote: >On 4/26/16, 6:58 PM, "Rob Austein"

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-07

On 5/26/16, 11:15 AM, "sidr on behalf of Stephen Kent" wrote: [Sorry for the delay...] > >> ... >>> It means that most of the code one needs to deal with version one is >>> the same as the code one needs to deal with version zero. Feel free >>>