Tim,
Although I appreciate that Randy is trying to explain the case in
terms anyone can understand, it would be preferable to keep it general.
agreed.
(Including a parenthetical note about the historical precedent of a
Dutch court order involving RIPE is relevant and might be included.)
Steve,
> On 01 Aug 2016, at 14:42, Stephen Kent wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
>
>>
>> Although I appreciate that Randy is trying to explain the case in terms
>> anyone can understand, it would be preferable to keep it general.
> agreed.
>>
>>> (Including a parenthetical note about the historical prece
Tim,
I agree that the preferred approach is to persuade law enforcement folks
to not view the RPKI as a new tool for taking down sites. However, I
have already encountered folks in the law enforcement community who
viewed it as such. I have argued that this wold be bad, but ...
Given the nat
you may, or may not, notice that the current i-d does not mention
ripe/ncc
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 06:36, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
>
> Hi Russ,
>
> Thank you for the pointers. I am traveling now but I will get back to it.
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
>> On 21 Jul 2016, at 10:56, Russ Housley wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Rob Austein wrote:
>>
>>> At Tue, 19 Jul
