Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

> yes, the chairs posed the question: "Err, did we sink your battleship > with too many docks?" to alvaro, he's still using his snorkel to swim > out of the trench... he'll get there he says :) it would seem desirable to get them through the iesg before closing sidr and transitioning to sidrops.

Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > Currently we have the following in IESG/pub-request status (13 > documents): > > draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions > > draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs > > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops > >

Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

> Currently we have the following in IESG/pub-request status (13 documents): > draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions > draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview > draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles >

Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

Restarting this thread, with some updates :) Preparing for Seoul in a few weeks time, with the intent that we do not meet face-to-face in Chicago, have all current 'protocol' related docs to the IESG/done and meet instead in sidr-ops if there are agenda items at that time :) Currently we have

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

I'll prepare the shepherd doc and await an ack/nack to this mail before pushing forward to IESG. On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote: > Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all, > > Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I > would like to see

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all, Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author... That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

howdy! it's past 10/25, so... I think despite seeing only 2 folk reply I think this document should move forward, so I'll send up a pub-request shortly. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) < kotikalapudi.sri...@nist.gov> wrote: > I read the draft once again. I support

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol - 10/25/2016

Thanks for reading (everyone) and commenting (many folks) this is being sent forward to the IESG now. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Sean Turner wrote: > This whole concept is analogous to existing DAP/LDAP mechanism and the > “delta” concept in CRLs. Considering this