> C1. The reference to rfc7607 should be Informative.
>
> C2. [Major] Security Considerations. I think that there is one
> consideration that should be mentioned in this section: Given that the
> largest value is preferred (2 = invalid), there is an attack vector
> where a router in the path
Dear authors:
Hi!
I have a couple of comments about this document (below). I am going to start
the IETF Last Call, and schedule it in the next IESG Telechat, with the
expectation that my comments will be addressed before then.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
C1. The reference to rfc7607 should be
howdy sidr folks,
as oer usual meeting-prep, our meeting is Thursday, if you are
presenting I expect to have your slides by no later than wed evening
9pm (2100 local)... in PDF format.
If you send 'not pdf' format, i'll convert them ... that is guaranteed
to not end well for you :) it behooves
