Re: [sidr] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

i had to do some ascii porn for rob to deal with a secdir reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-publication. it may help here. i added the routers for this discussion. +--++--++--+ | CA || CA || CA | +--++--++--+ |

Re: [sidr] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03

Dan, Thanks for the review. Adverse actions include cases where the CA or repository manager is not attacked or did not make an error, as noted in the Introduction: Note that the CA that allocated the affected INRs may be acting in accordance with established policy, and thus the change may

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-04

Tim: Congratulations! ☺ I think we’re in sync with everything else, just this last piece is outstanding. Thanks! Alvaro. On 1/9/17, 6:55 AM, "Tim Bruijnzeels" > wrote: Let me try to make the point again – I didn’t do a good job above. In fact,

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-04

Hi Alvaro, in-line > On 07 Jan 2017, at 00:04, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote: > > On 12/28/16, 11:43 AM, "Tim Bruijnzeels" > wrote: > > Tim: > > Happy New Year!! Thank you, you (all) too!! > > > | Thank you for your in-depth

[sidr] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For