Not sure why you send this to authors/editors.
The document is in IETF Last Call.
So comments need to to got to IETF or IESG list.
Your comments seem to be comments that get responded
to a WG or IETF Last Call. Those comments need to
go to WG and/or IESG or IETF list.
On 12/4/12 5:15 PM, heasl
Mmm.. seems I even forget about such updates.
OK, I agree we should make that change.
Randy (Bush) do you want me to do that or will you do it?
Bert
On 11/28/12 4:51 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
The MIB doctors approved a change to MIB security considerations:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/
27;re discussion are:
- drafts/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-13.txt
- drafts/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-tc-mib-03.txt
In fact I had below discussion on bgp4-mibv2-12.txt,
which resulted in revision 13.
On 3/13/12 9:46 PM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
On 3/11/12 7:36 PM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Bert,
On Jan 17,
Support adoption as WG doc.
Bert
On 1/21/12 1:19 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:
The working group has been requested to adopt draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt
as a working group draft.
The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl.
Please respond to the list to say
On 11/1/11 9:25 AM, t.petch wrote:
Bert
That makes me wonder what you would regard as the base MIB for bgp4. The idr WG
has been updating it for over five years, and the topic surfaces occasionally on
that list but I cannot recall anything for a year now, so what would the base
be?
(And yes,
Hi SIDR people,
We have merged the two earlier MIB modules into one.
It has undergone quite a set of changes.
I think it would be good to review and discuss it at the
upcoming IETF meeting.
We have not yet defined the objects that extend the bgp4 MIB
to show if a route is valid, invalid or notfo
As a WG participant who reads this with a "writing a MIB module
for RPKI" I have no issues with this document.
Bert
On 10/28/11 3:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
Two folks seem to have given this a read-through, is that all the
interest that exists? is documenting how originators of routes oug
Great and thanks.
Bert
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Huston"
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)"
Cc: "Stephen Kent" ; ;
; "George Michaelson" ; ;
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" ; "Ron Bonica" ;
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 2:05 AM
S
ought about it and explains why you do list
a minimum time but not a max.
Bert
- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Huston"
To: "Stephen Kent"
Cc: ; ; "George Michaelson"
; ; "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" ;
"Ron Bonica" ; ; "Bert Wijnen
Re: Operations Directorate Review of draft-ietf-sidr-keyroThanks, and your
suggested changes do address al my comments/concerns/questions,
bert
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Kent
To: Bert (IETF) Wijnen ; stbry...@cisco.com ; elw...@dial.pipex.com
Cc: Geoff Huston ; g...@ap
10 matches
Mail list logo
