Re: [sidr] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions-03

Many thanks again for the review, Dan. Thanks for the explanation re: the title, Steve — I was also wondering about it at first. I have posted a no-objection position for this document in tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [sidr] [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10

Thanks for your (re-)review, Peter! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

[sidr] Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06: (with COMMENT)

Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [sidr] [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-19

Dale, all, Thanks for the review, re-review, and changes. I’m posting a No Objection position for this draft in today’s IESG telechat. But: > 3.1.1. Subject > > However, each > certificate issued by an individual CA MUST contain a Subject name > that is unique to that CA context. > >

Re: [sidr] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12

Thanks for your review, Roni. > I think the document need an editorial review, a lot of text in > passive language, for example Authors — do take a note. I am posting a No Objection vote on the document in today’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP