Chris,
I already said that (as a co-author) I support killing off LTAM at this
time.
I also should note that I support adoption of SLURM as a way to replace
several
of the critical capabilities that LTAM offered, in a much simpler fashion.
Steve
yes, please put a stake in it!
Steve
Howdy SIDR folks,
This draft expired:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-ltamgmt/
I think this is proper, given the discussion on-list and in-person, we
seem to have moved away from the world of LTA management and on to:
slurm:
Howdy SIDR folks,
This draft expired:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sidr/draft-ietf-sidr-ltamgmt/
I think this is proper, given the discussion on-list and in-person, we
seem to have moved away from the world of LTA management and on to:
slurm:
LTAmgmt: destroy it, destroy it utterly. Laugh and scream with joy at its
termination.
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 17:07:56 -0400, Stephen Kent wrote:
yes, please put a stake in it!
Steve
Howdy SIDR folks,
This draft expired:
I think this is proper, given the discussion on-list and
An off-list post reminded me:
draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases-02.txt
is still of interest and probably should get worked on prior to slurm.
(at least so we know why we'll be interested in slurm)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:11 PM, m...@islandpeaksoftware.com wrote:
LTAmgmt: destroy it, destroy it
