On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:56:44 -0800, Randy Bush said:
>
> RB> As you say, NetConf is for *configuring* routers. RPKI-rtr is not used
> RB> for router configuration, but rather dynamic data, a la IS-IS or BGP.
> RB> In fact, the RPKI-rtr p
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:56:44 -0800, Randy Bush said:
RB> As you say, NetConf is for *configuring* routers. RPKI-rtr is not used
RB> for router configuration, but rather dynamic data, a la IS-IS or BGP.
RB> In fact, the RPKI-rtr payload data go into the same data structure as
RB> the BGP da
On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:51 PM, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG
> (sidr) to consider the following document:
> - 'The RPKI/Router Protocol'
> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solici
[ people whacked me to resend to sidr list ]
I am not sure if this is an architectural misunderstanding V a red
herring.
As you say, NetConf is for *configuring* routers. RPKI-rtr is not used
for router configuration, but rather dynamic data, a la IS-IS or BGP.
In fact, the RPKI-rtr payload data
The IESG has received a request from the Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG
(sidr) to consider the following document:
- 'The RPKI/Router Protocol'
as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive co
