Thanks for reading (everyone) and commenting (many folks)
this is being sent forward to the IESG now.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> This whole concept is analogous to existing DAP/LDAP mechanism and the
> “delta” concept in CRLs. Considering this protocol is run over h
This whole concept is analogous to existing DAP/LDAP mechanism and the “delta”
concept in CRLs. Considering this protocol is run over https it seems like a
step in the right direction away from unsecured rsync. So the idea seems
sensible and after re-reading the draft I think we are a go for l
Hi all,
I have read this draft and believe it is useful for the synchronization.
Please ship it.
Yu
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
ship it.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i believe i already responded, but just in case.
>
> have read, have used, no ill affects detected. ship it.
>
> randy
>
> ___
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mai
i believe i already responded, but just in case.
have read, have used, no ill affects detected. ship it.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
Howdy!
5 more days until this call expires, please read and comment... or at least
say:
"Hey! I did read this it is [awesome|horrible|acceptable|dumpsterfire]"
thanks!
-chris
(feel free to cut/paste/edit the quote if it'll save you time)
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Chris Morrow
wrote:
>
Howdy WG Folks!
Let's chat (email) about the subject document:
draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol
The authors believe they have dealt with all open items and are
interested in moving this document forward to IESG for
publication. Let's have a read/write/arithmetic time with the draft
and send comme