On 2/10/11 9:14 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your careful review.
Purely selfish on my part ;) Turns out to be less email now rather than
later.
On 11/02/11 11:31 AM, Sean Turnerturn...@ieca.com wrote:
Lots of hats in this WG... With my nit-noid checker hat on ;)
Lots of hats in this WG... With my nit-noid checker hat on ;)
- Should this be a BCP or standards track?
- Expand RPKI in abstract and introduction
- Sec 2: r/description od/description of
- Sec 3: r/, [I-D.ietf-sidr-rpki-manifests]./
, and [I-D.ietf-sidr-rpki-manifests].
- Add
Hi Sean,
Thank you for your careful review.
On 11/02/11 11:31 AM, Sean Turner turn...@ieca.com wrote:
Lots of hats in this WG... With my nit-noid checker hat on ;)
- Should this be a BCP or standards track?
To me this sits in BCP space, it really describes the best action IANA
should
