At 10:24 AM +0900 10/31/09, Randy Bush wrote:
>> Perhaps " Names for IANA and RIRs will be meaningless directory
distinguished ."
We can add some more text to make such this is unambiguous.
we are consciously not proscribing 'meaningful' names for other IRs?
randy
we are consciously
Perhaps " Names for IANA and RIRs will be meaningless directory
distinguished ."
>>> We can add some more text to make such this is unambiguous.
>>we are consciously not proscribing 'meaningful' names for other IRs?
> we are consciously proscribing 'meaningful' names for ALL subject
>> Perhaps " Names for IANA and RIRs will be meaningless directory
>> distinguished ."
> We can add some more text to make such this is unambiguous.
we are consciously not proscribing 'meaningful' names for other IRs?
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sid
At 8:52 PM -0700 10/28/09, Terry Manderson wrote:
Oppose.
Although opposition is based on a small number of nits:
* Section 1.7, page 11. "RPKI signed Object" ... "declared to be such by a
standards track RFC issued by the SIDR WG"
Over time, the SIDR WG may not exist, or the name could change
Oppose.
Although opposition is based on a small number of nits:
* Section 1.7, page 11. "RPKI signed Object" ... "declared to be such by a
standards track RFC issued by the SIDR WG"
Over time, the SIDR WG may not exist, or the name could change, or valid
RPKI objects come from other WG's. Perhap
On 28/10/2009, at 1:43 PM, Geoff Huston wrote:
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from
the authors of draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt
The Last Call will end as of the close
The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the
authors of draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt.
The document (and the draft history) is at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-07.txt
The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd
November - this is a
