It seems that the alt-doc has some revising to be done though adoption
by the WG seems like the right path here. Some author-author
discussion is being done, with some doc updates. I think the WG wants
this to be at LC in/before Bejing. We have a month to do that work.
Unless there are complaints
On Aug 25, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an
alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I
I am in favor of the WG switching to the simpler format, but only if
the issues I raised on the list and at the meeting are addressed.
Good.
Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't
the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to
replace sidr-ta-04?
At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:18:32 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is
Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the sidr
meeting in
I am asking for comment on the list as to whether there is wg consensus
that draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04 should use the alternative format.
yes, please.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
I support the use of this alternative format.
Cheers
Terry
On 25/08/10 6:25 PM, Sandra Murphy sandra.mur...@sparta.com wrote:
Forgot to add the obligatory coda:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an
alternate trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
sidr meeting in IETF78 in Maastricht.
I am
On 26/08/2010, at 9:27 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
At 4:18 AM -0400 8/25/10, Sandra Murphy wrote:
Draft draft-weiler-sidr-trust-anchor-format-00.txt suggests an alternate
trust anchor representation format from that proposed in
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-04. This alternate format was discussed in the
Also, I would not characterize the question as you did above. Isn't
the proposal for a (hopefully revised) version of Sam's draft to
replace sidr-ta-04?
indeed. sam's draft should replace.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
