The call for adoption had ended. I see 6 responses supporting adoption
and none opposing. I consider this adequate consensus from the wg to
adopt the document as a wg draft.
The authors should submit a new version as a wg draft (with the
draft-ietf-sidr format file name).
--Sandy, speaking
The working group has been requested to adopt
draft-lepinski-bgpsec-overview-00 as a working group draft, to satisfy the
following item on our charter:
ID DatePub Date
Mar 2011 Jan 2012 An overview of the RPKI and BGP Protocol changes
required for origin and path validation
Please
I think this item should be WG document and I am willing to review and
contribute.
Cheers,
Terry
On 19/04/2011, at 9:29 PM, Sandra Murphy sandra.mur...@sparta.com wrote:
The working group has been requested to adopt
draft-lepinski-bgpsec-overview-00 as a working group draft, to satisfy the
i support adoption
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
At Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:29:06 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Sandy Murphy wrote:
Mar 2011 Jan 2012 An overview of the RPKI and BGP Protocol changes
required for origin and path validation
I support adoption.
___
sidr mailing
