Apologies for taking so long to get back to these. I’ve gone ahead and posted
-15; -14 was about to expire. I suspect that there will be a -16 to address
changes that result from resolving #3-5 and #9.
spt
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 21:07, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
> Well.
>
> The mail archive
Another thought about one point in my long list of comments.
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 9:07 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>
>
> 4. “corresponds” again - there’s no mention of a router verifying that the
> router cert it receives has an AS that is configured on the router. There
> are lots of other
>
> So .rtf attachments, if anyone were so wise as to try one, should now show up
> in the archive.
>
Unwise!
—Sandy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
The Secretariat has responded to my ticket about the attachment problem noted
below.
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 5:17 PM, x via RT wrote:
>
> Hi Sandy,
>
> It turns out the archive did not have support for the "text/rtf" mimetype.
> This
> has now been added and the attachment appears in the mes
Well.
The mail archive does not seem to show attachments. For me. I see do see
attachments on other messages.
It would be nice to know if anyone has seen attachments on my messages in the
last few weeks.
At any rate, for the mail archive, the comments are copied below the signature.
—San
Sorry, the reply did not pick up the original attachment.
Attached here.
Let me know if there are problems reading the comments.
—Sandy
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1404\cocoasubrtf470
{\fonttbl\f0\fmodern\fcharset0 Courier;\f1\fnil\fcharset0 Menlo-Regular;}
{\colortbl;\red255\green255\blu
Speaking as wg co-chair
Please, wg, do take a look at the comments attached. This draft was requested
by the operators and is important.
Some of the comments are about substance. Those at the very least must be
considered by the wg.
Please take advantage of focused attention and close proxim
