> shouldnt rpkiRtrCacheServerV4ActiveRecords et al be in an afi/safi table?
> in theory, other afis may be supported.
the rpki and rfc 3779 support only ipv6 and ipv6. so i think there is
an issue here.
randy
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https:/
Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:25:16PM +0100, Bert Wijnen (IETF):
> Not sure why you send this to authors/editors.
>
> The document is in IETF Last Call.
> So comments need to to got to IETF or IESG list.
>
> Your comments seem to be comments that get responded
> to a WG or IETF Last Call. Those comment
Not sure why you send this to authors/editors.
The document is in IETF Last Call.
So comments need to to got to IETF or IESG list.
Your comments seem to be comments that get responded
to a WG or IETF Last Call. Those comments need to
go to WG and/or IESG or IETF list.
On 12/4/12 5:15 PM, heasl
