There were more than a dozen positive replies to this request (leaving out
those who replied more than once :-) ), and one caveated reply, so I am
going to judge this as working group consensus to adopt the draft as a
working group item.
--Sandy
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Sandra Murphy wrote:
I support adoption of the TA draft as a SIDR WG document.
Karen
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
On Mar 26, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic
(trust anchors) from the res certs profile document. As this wa
Yes, please adopt this draft as a WG item.
TAs and TA management are important tools/features for next-gen routing
security.
/thomas/
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
I support this document as WG item.
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC.
On 26/03/2009, at 12:32, Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic
(t
Yes, please adopt this draft as a WG item.
Rob
--
Robert Loomans
On 26/03/2009, at 12:32, Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic
I also support the adoption of this document.
Robert
Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic (trust
anchors) from the res certs profil
I am requesting that the working group members state whether or not
they accept draft draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt as a working group draft.
Since the certificate profile was already accepted by the WG, and the
subject of draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was previously part of that
certificate profile
I support the adoption of sidr-ta as a WG document.
-danny
On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic
(tr
I also support the draft as a WG document.
/John
On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
I support adoption of the TA draft as a SIDR WG document.
Steve
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
__
/John
On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
I support adoption of the TA draft as a SIDR WG document.
Steve
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
___
> So I am requesting that the working group members state whether or not
> they accept draft draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt as a working group draft.
i am happy to accept the work in the wg if only to chop the hell out of
it.
i think the document is sorely broken and the complexity is a sick
kludge t
I support adoption of the TA draft as a SIDR WG document.
Steve
___
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
I support draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00 becoming a work group item.
Terry
On 26/03/2009, at 12:32 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic
I support the adoption of draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00 as a SIDR working group
document.
- Matt Lepinski
Sandra Murphy wrote:
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important to
There were objections yesterday in the sidr meeting to the way that
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt became a wg draft.
draft-ietf-sidr-ta-00.txt was an extract of an important topic (trust
anchors) from the res certs profile document. As this was work that had
already been a working group work item
16 matches
Mail list logo
