Dear Oleksandr,
I think that as long as you do FFT, you can't simply ignore some points just
because everything is zero there. You have to consider each Fourier
component, and the number of those equals the number of points. So the
scaling is (at least, should be) O(NlnN) where N is the number of
Hi everyone:
I want to lean some knowledge about the relaxations in SIESTA. Can you
sent me some infromations about the principle of the CG and Anneal.
Could you sent me some papers about the arithmetic of the CG and Anneal.
Thankyou
Dear Siaram
preferabely use mpich-1 or lam mpi. We have found that using mpich-2
leads to such errors in many packages. And statically compile the
siesta binary.
Sharat
Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Yahoo! Messenger. Download
Now! http://messenger.yahoo.com/download.php
Hi Alexander Vozny,
are you using a Monkhorst pack grid for the K-points?, this in principle
would explain the time dependence when increasing the cell, however if
you use certain K-grid cutoff I don't know which can be the reason.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all.
Juan
Oleksandr V
Actually, I'm not quite sure that stress and external pressure must have
different signs, I think that they must be same. You can compare the
signs by running a fixed cell calculation and seeing by yourself: SIESTA
outputs both the pressure and the stress. So I'd say that this is more like
a bug o
Dear developers and list users,
I dug a little bit into the source code, and have confirmed
that there is a bug in the code. The negative symbol should
be removed in line 143 - 151 of cgvc.F, by replaceing
tstres(1,1) = - sxx * tp
tstres(2,2) = - syy * tp
Hi siesta users
We are having difficulty with mpi runs for siesta-2.0. We recently
imstalled mpich2 and a new version of mpich which is giving us the
following errror.
siesta: iscf Eharris(eV) E_KS(eV) FreeEng(eV) dDmax Ef(eV)
siesta:1 -152683.1368 -152352.1585 -152352.1585 1.
7 matches
Mail list logo