It's especially strange that the spin polarized calculation give worse
result for O2 (did you use spin polarized calcuation for that O atom
also?). The ground state of O2 is a triplet, and hence should be
described better by a spin polarized calculation. I would try setting
Eshift to a lower va
Haitao:
Thanks for the PBE pseudopotentials.
I tried it on a few small molecules such as O2, O3, CH4 by setting
MeshCutoff=250Ry.
DZP basis with Eshift=0.02Ry
Everything else default.
And found the atomization energy quite good for most molecules except
for CH4/Methane and O3/Ozone.
CH4: 19.39e
Dear Marcel,
thank you for suggestions, but I didn't help :(
I followed the instructions of Sebastien's how-to and everything
seemed to be ok, except the last stage of SIESTA linking :
...
/siesta/libs/blacs_MPI-LINUX-0.a(BI_Pack.o): In function `BI_Pack':
BI_Pack.c:(.text+0x31): undefined referen
Oleksandr,
Thanks for pointing this out. From what I see (by plotting
charge.gplot), it doesn't matter where the core cutoff is, there is
always a pseudo core charge in the final pseudopotential. The core
cutoff does determine the amount of core charge generated. So I guess
making core cu
It was already on the list:
There is indeed a silly bug in the denchar code that checks for files.
The fix is to replace the file Src/m_denchar_init.f by the one given in
the issues web page:
http://fisica.ehu.es/ag/siesta-extra/issues.html#denchar
Your core cutoffs are wrong. Have you ever tried to plot the AECHARGE
(CORE) and PSEUDOCHARGE and COREQ?
The core states are always more localized than valence states and at r
of maximum of valence wavefunctions core states charge density are
already 0.
Thus making core cutoff bigger than s cuto
Dear SIESTA users
I want to use the denchar program to plot charge densities of molecules. I have
compiled denchar successfully in the top directory..
After a run, SIESTA generate the PLD and DIM files needed to the denchar
calculation.
I've running the code as indicate in the denchar manual (s
Dear Riccardo,
thank you for your answer, but the problem is that when I'm running
denchar with a k-point other than the Gamma,
the program stops and gives the following error:
Wavefunctions file contains more then 1 k-point
DENCHAR can only handle the Gamma point!!
So maybe you have a newe
Dear Zelia,
with a delay difficult to justify, :-) I might have some useful advice
for your problem.
I need to plot wavefunctions at k-points other than the Gamma point.
For the Gamma point Denchar does a good job, but it can't handle the
other k-points...
There is a little trick that can
Dear Yurko
have you also downloaded icc? You should compile scalapack & Co with icc
& ifort. Look in the mailing list for a guide written by sebastian le
roux.
And by the way, compile mpich 2.0 by yourself could help too.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Yurko Natanzon wrote:
LAPACK=-lmkl_lapack
BLAS=
Dear colleagues,
Actually I have the same problem with parallel compilation of SIESTA on
Intel Core Duo machine. I've downloaded and installed Intel Fortran Compiler
(ifort), Intel MKL Libraries Cluster Edition, Intel MPI. I've also compiled
scalapack and blas from scratch, but still have lots of "
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Saswata Bhattacharya wrote:
| dear friends,
| after a succesful siesta run which file shows the value of the fermi energy
| of the system?
| i need to know the value of fermi energy which i cant see in the output
Dear Saswata,
try harder:
siesta: iscf Eharris(eV) E_K
An experimentalists question I suspect, but why do you include (empty) 3d
and 4f states in your PP for C, whereas the example C PP supplied in the
SIESTA package only includes the (ground state) occupied orbitals?
Tx
Ian
dear friends,
after a succesful siesta run which file shows the value of the fermi energy of
the system?if i want to plot the DOS file with fermi energy keepin at zero is
it possible to do this?normally in LMTO we can do this at our will,is this same
possible in siesta?if not we can shift the or
Here's PBE pseudopotential I generated for C, O, H. You might wanna test
them in your calculation before use.
Haitao
You Lin wrote:
Dear collegues:
Could you please tell me where I can find good GGA(PBE)
pseudo-potentials and basis sets for C, N, H ,O?
I can only find LDA pseudo-potential
15 matches
Mail list logo