> Dear all,
> I have something unclear with lattice parameter of GGA Siesta calculation
> on
> Body centered Cr.
> Calculation without SpinPolarized gives lattice parameter a=2.89
> Angstrom.
> The experimental value is a=2.88.
> Same calculation with "SpinPolarized= True" gives a=3.94 Angstrom
Dear all,
I have something unclear with lattice parameter of GGA Siesta calculation on
Body centered Cr.
Calculation without SpinPolarized gives lattice parameter a=2.89 Angstrom.
The experimental value is a=2.88.
Same calculation with "SpinPolarized= True" gives a=3.94 Angstrom which is
very d
Just realized the problem, for some reason the program was not calculating
my primitive cell correctly, but now I used the LatticeVectors block and it
was fixed.
Thanks for the help
2009/5/31 Edan Scriven
> I'm guessing the problem lies in your AtomicCoordinatesAndAtomicSpecies
> block. Try rem
Dear All
Hello,
I am working on interaction of carbon nanotubes and others molecules such as
CO2 or NH3. I have prepered attached input file (CNT-CO2.fdf) and run it but
after 2 or 3 SCIs in cgwf my energy and gradient are NaN. I try to test
differents configuration for exchange and corelation
Hi Lydia
The references given by Shi are the fundamental ones
for pseudopotential theory.
If you wanted to acknowledge the program, the person
behind it is Alberto Garcia.
best
Emilio
shihitwh wrote:
Dear Nemec,
Here are some articles about citaion of Atom.
Original idea of the ab-initio
5 matches
Mail list logo