Dear SIESTA users:
I used dzp atomic basis,160 ry meshcutoff ,30 Bohr kgrid cutoff to calculate 
FePt system(see the pictures of my unit cell in attachment), however, it seems 
to take forever to converge with the SCF cycle. dDMax(around 1.0) stays far 
beyond tolerence (0.00001), and if I increase the cell to 108 atom unit 
cell(3x3x3 supercell), dDmax becomes even larger. Yet the simplest unit cell 
with 4 atoms converges fine.

I also used szp atomic basis,spin polarized and larger cutoff(300 ry 
meshcutoff,40 Bohr kgrid cutoff ) with 32 atom cell, the problem is still the 
same, it seems to have nothing to do with the cutoff I choose.

Could anyone give me a clue where the problem might lie? I would really 
appericiate your help.
If it doesn't converge, the forces and stress are wrong and so is the later MD 
steps.

Here is a fragment of my SCF cycle:
siesta:   42   -25183.5213   -24873.4575   -24873.4883  1.2337 -2.1597
siesta:   43   -25153.3555   -24872.5874   -24872.6213  1.0953 -1.7754
siesta:   44   -25204.6434   -24870.7750   -24870.8201  1.0794 -2.1741
siesta:   45   -25174.8238   -24868.9171   -24868.9419  1.3392 -2.3371
siesta:   46   -25138.7377   -24868.4595   -24868.4879  1.0200 -2.1080
siesta:   47   -25177.5378   -24866.3887   -24866.4199  1.1245 -1.9894
siesta:   48   -25159.6251   -24865.8291   -24865.8733  1.0482 -2.0247
siesta:   49   -25206.9572   -24864.1873   -24864.2264  1.0436 -2.1378

I attached the output file and pictures of the unit cell I used. Generally 
speaking, the atomic position is the same as FCC crystal, only that 
a=b,c=0.95a, because of the ordering alignment of Fe and Pt ( a layer of Fe 
then a layer of Pt along the c-axis)





SuiYang
2006-12-05

Attachment: FePtsuper2.out
Description: Binary data

<<attachment: 2.JPG>>

<<attachment: 1.JPG>>

Reply via email to