Re: [SIESTA-L] SCF not converged

2010-03-28 Por tôpico N H
Even though I'm not a communist ... For a metal even such Pulay can be to big ... I have cases when I got convergence only with 0.005 ... Andrey's typs are also very helpful 2010/3/28 guohuaihong > Dear SIESTA-communist, > > I am a SIESTA green hand, and I try to get self-consistent calculation

[SIESTA-L] Could you please give us a license to access your wonderful code

2010-03-28 Por tôpico vega lew
Dear developer, I am a graduate student in Nanjing University of Technology. I am very interested in you wonderful code-Siesta. Could you please give us a license to acess your code. I filled the form in your web page to apply for the license a couple days ago. But our application is still in

Re: [*] Re: [SIESTA-L] Difference in Fermi Energy

2010-03-28 Por tôpico Sushil Auluck
nicolags, it could be that your system is fluctuatin between semi-metallic and semi-conducting phases in the scf interations...you may try many things... 1. increase # of k-points 2. decrease the mixing 3. try to increase broadening in dos... s.auluck > Hello S. Auluck, > > Thank you for your an

Re: [SIESTA-L] Difference in Fermi Energy

2010-03-28 Por tôpico Nicolas Leconte
Hello S. Auluck, Thank you for your answer. But as mentioned to Alberto, my system is still semi-metallic (bandgap crossing not far from K k-point), so no bandgap is present... I will do some tests on pure graphene to see if the problem occurs there too. Nicolas On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 9:50 AM,

Re: [SIESTA-L] SCF not converged

2010-03-28 Por tôpico apostnik
> Dear SIESTA-communist, I wonder how many in the community will feel addressed... Anyway, here is my guess: You set spin = true but do not define DM.InitSpin block (unless I overlooked it). In this case all atoms, including Ga, are initialized with maximal spin moment. Then the system tries to re

Re: [SIESTA-L] Difference in Fermi Energy

2010-03-28 Por tôpico Sushil Auluck
hi, in a semi-conductor or insulator there is a energy gap. in this region the dos is zero. so in principle E_f can be placed anywhere in between because E_f is determined by the integral of N(E)dE from zero to E_f which must give the total number of valence electrons. it depends on the condition