>Sorry about the long explanation,
Dear Jose,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SUCH A DESCRIPTIVE ANSWER. KEEP IT UP. (if it does not
consume much of your precious time) This post are very useful to us. They are
like summary of some review articles...
Thanks again.
Sagar Ambavale
The M.S. University of
Dear Jose,
I appreciate your kind explanation.
It was really helpful to understand the system.
Regards,
Kyoung
Quoting "Jose A. Torres" :
Dear Kyoung:
When it comes to I-V characteristics of molecular
size devices, comparisons to experimental results
is not straight forward.
Even if ther
Dear Marcos,
I am not sure if I understood you correctly, but I checked my calculation
with graphene (with options that you indicated) and I did not get any
changes. The convergence is still reached very fast and the final Pressure
is 0.4 GPa. Just to be on save side, I would like you to glance at
Dear Kyoung:
When it comes to I-V characteristics of molecular
size devices, comparisons to experimental results
is not straight forward.
Even if there is only ballistic transport in the
experimental device (which is so for metallic point
contacts and low biases to a 99% accuracy), there
are man
Thank you very Much
Best regards
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:58 PM, eb na wrote:
> Dear akbar,
>
> if you mean the virtual nano lab from quantumwise, it is very similar to
> the SIesta. You can make DFT calculation as well as transport calculation
> like Transiesta. However the code is commercia
Dear akbar,
if you mean the virtual nano lab from quantumwise, it is very similar to the
SIesta. You can make DFT calculation as well as transport calculation like
Transiesta. However the code is commercial and not open source.
regards,
--- akbar jahangiri schrieb am Fr, 30.4.2010:
Von: akba
Dear Users and Developers
Does anyone perhaps know whether NANO_LAB (which is a package for
simulation) contains Transiesta or Siesta ?
Best regards
Akbar
